Thursday, February 28, 2008

It Really COULD have been More...

15




I think "being short" may have worked against me.


Stolen from Stew, whom I adore. He's Dog People, people.

11 Comments:

Blogger Warped Mind of Ron said...

LOL, I could take 21 of them little buggers.

February 28, 2008 9:28 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Yay! I could take 20! "Lock up your kids" just took on a whole new meaning.

February 28, 2008 9:59 PM  
Blogger Pageant Mom said...

I can take 21.

I think the whole using one as a weapon against the others gives and extra point.

You know that kids are born with martial arts ability? Or at least they all know that "dead weight" trick....

;o)

February 28, 2008 11:07 PM  
Blogger kenju said...

They say that I could do 14 of them - and I'm old! LOL

February 28, 2008 11:17 PM  
Blogger Rich | Championable said...

21 here. That was funny.

February 29, 2008 6:28 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Twenty freakin' six. Little weasels. If only I had some martial arts experience.

February 29, 2008 8:21 AM  
Blogger tiff said...

Count me in for 21 too! I was shooting for higher, but those daggone moral compass questions kicked my butt.

February 29, 2008 8:21 AM  
Blogger Rick said...

Yup, 21 seems to be the magic number. How is it that I find the whole idea morally reprehensible, yet have no problem using a child as a weapon?

February 29, 2008 10:42 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Like I said at Tiff's, 18. And that was with me lying to appear tougher than I am.

Sheesh.

February 29, 2008 11:05 AM  
Blogger Blonde Goddess said...

I too already informed Tiff that I am capable of taking on 19 little poop smearing, nose picking, paper eating little bastards...

February 29, 2008 11:35 AM  
Blogger Tracy Lynn said...

28! That's not really a surprise, though. If there had been spoons, it would have been higher.

February 29, 2008 1:05 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home